Search for: "In Re: Mathes v." Results 1 - 20 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2008, 6:19 pm
  Christian, it's worth noting, has a Ph.D. in math from Texas A&M so we're all prone to trusting him on this one. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:50 pm
On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a landmark decision in In re Bilski. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by David Post
At least some of the justices, he suggests, have “a reluctance — even an allergy — to taking math and statistics seriously,” as evidenced most recently by their questions and comments at the Oct. 3 oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Gill v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 8:20 am by Tom Smith
“We’re pleased to settle this case favorably on behalf of Pam, and we hope that it will encourage school districts across the country to support the constitutionally protected freedom of teachers to teach and communicate honestly with both children and parents. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 9:44 am
And of course getting math wrong means you get your message wrong, in this case hilariously the opposite of what they're paid to shill. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 10:38 am
Unless my math is wrong, that's 43 years ago. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
May 2, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Volcano Produce, Inc., Serial No. 86321169 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of GOLDENBERRY for "fresh fruits"].May 2, 2017 -2 PM: In re Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC, Serial Nos. 85179591 and 85179618 [refusal to register the mark shown below, in color and in black-and-white, for "restaurant services and restaurant carry-out services," without a disclaimer of LOBSTER].May 4, 2017 -2 PM: Advanced California Innovative… [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 9:03 am
" Multiply those numbers together and you get $297 million -- a little less than half as much as $644 million.And here's the thing: a source with knowledge of the real numbers tells us we're so low in our estimate of the Times's printing costs that we're not even in the ballpark.Are we trying to say the the New York Times should force all its print subscribers onto the Kindle or else? [read post]